Rebecca Elliot | Wall Street Journal
Texas regulators on Tuesday debated curtailing oil output in the state in response to cratering demand caused by the new coronavirus, but it quickly became apparent that the industry was divided over taking such a historic step.
The virtual discussion by the Railroad Commission of Texas over whether to limit production—something the state last did in the 1970s—attracted numerous oil industry leaders, including the heads of shale producers Pioneer Natural Resources Co., Parsley Energy Inc. and Marathon Oil Corp.
No immediate decision was expected Tuesday, when U.S. benchmark oil prices fell roughly 10% to $20 a barrel as concerns over oversupply grew. Over the weekend, a coalition of countries including Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed to reduce output by 9.7 million barrels a day, but many believe that won’t be enough to address lost demand as people stay home due to the pandemic
Pioneer Chief Executive Scott Sheffield urged the state to reduce daily oil output by one million barrels in May, or nearly 20% from January levels.
“Nobody wants to give us capital because we have all destroyed capital and created economic waste,” Mr. Sheffield said. “If the Texas Railroad Commission does not regulate long-term, we will disappear as an industry like the coal industry,” he said.
Marathon Oil Chief Executive Lee Tillman urged commissioners to allow companies to chart their own paths.
“Supply-and-demand imbalances will always occur, and in those times, some companies will succeed and others will fail,” said Mr. Tillman. “What will be the threshold to toss aside free-market principles in the future?”
He suggested that the federal government could support the oil-and-gas industry by having the military purchase refined products such as gasoline or by giving operators more flexibility to suspend production on drilling leases.
Jim Teague, co-chief executive of pipeline company Enterprise Products Partners LP, questioned the motivations of the companies pushing for the railroad commission to order cuts, though he didn’t name the firms.
“Are they really trying to fix a problem, or do they want to argue that government action by you gives them the opportunity to get out of some of their obligations?” Mr. Teague said.
U.S. antitrust laws limit the federal government’s ability to curtail oil production, but Texas empowers its railroad commission to do so independently when production exceeds market demand.
At the heart of Tuesday’s debate was whether the current situation amounted to a wasting of Texas oil resources, a condition regulators struggled to define after decades of not imposing curtailments.
Commission members spent the early hours of the hearing asking executives how proration, as the output cuts are known, would help to bring supply and demand back into balance and how they envision implementing cuts, as well as what constitutes wasting oil.
Some on the panel, whose three members are elected by state voters, have expressed reservations about forcing production cuts.
“The Railroad Commission of Texas has the power to limit oil production but the president does not, and that’s kind of a sobering responsibility we find ourselves holding,” Chairman Wayne Christian said at the hearing’s outset. “Despite my reservations on this limiting, I am open to discussion.”
The threat of unemployment in the industry loomed large over the hearing, with opponents and supporters of output cuts both arguing that jobs would be lost if the wrong decision were made.